Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 145, P18-23, March 2021

Assessment of the validity and acceptability of the online FRAIL scale in identifying frailty among older people in community settings

  • Ruby Yu
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

    Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
    Search for articles by this author
  • Cecilia Tong
    Affiliations
    Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
    Search for articles by this author
  • Grace Leung
    Affiliations
    Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jean Woo
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

    Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • The online FRAIL scale predicts functional limitations and hospitalization in Chinese older persons.
      • The online FRAIL scale could be adopted in the routine workflow of community elderly centres, which might facilitate frailty prevention.
      • Further effort is required to improve the acceptability of the online FRAIL scale among older persons.

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To assess the validity and acceptability of the online FRAIL scale in identifying frailty in community settings.

      Methods

      Frailty was assessed using the online version of the FRAIL scale (a simple frailty questionnaire). Validity of the scale was examined in a sample of 1882 persons aged 60 years or older (inlcuding a pilot sample of 65 persons for assessing the face validity) recruited from 24 elderly centres in Hong Kong. Convergent validity was estimated using correlation coefficients between scores on the FRAIL, SARC-F (a simple questionnaire for assessing sarcopenia) and AMIC (Abbreviated Memory Inventory for the Chinese). Predictive validity was examined by logistic regression using IADL (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living) limitations and hospitalization as outcomes. Acceptability of the scale was assessed from the perspective of a sub-sample of 205 older persons and 33 centre staff.

      Results

      Following minor revisions, all participants were able to understand and answer the online FRAIL scale. The FRAIL scale correlated with SARC-F (r = 0.627, p < 0.001) and AMIC (r = 0.302, p < 0.001). Being pre-frail and frail were associated with incident IADL limitations (OR = 1.58, 95 %CI = 1.11−2.25 and OR = 3.01, 95 %CI = 1.87−4.84, respectively) and incident hospitalization (OR = 1.38, 95 %CI = 1.03−1.85 and OR = 2.79, 95 %CI = 1.89−4.12, respectively) at year 2, after controlling for age, sex, marital status, and educational level. 77.8 % of participants agreed that the scale would enable them to understand their health status. However, only 35.0 % accepted a digital approach for conducting health assessment or accessing assessment results. 90.9 % of centre staff agreed that the scale could be used to identify their members who are potential candidates for frailty intervention.

      Conclusions

      The online FRAIL scale is valid for use in community elderly centres in identifying frailty. Further effort is required to improve the acceptability of the online FRAIL scale among older persons.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Maturitas
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fried L.P.
        • Tangen C.M.
        • Walston J.
        • Newman A.B.
        • Hirsch C.
        • Gottdiener J.
        • Seeman T.
        • Tracy R.
        • Kop W.J.
        • Burke G.
        • McBurnie M.A.
        • Collabor C.H.S.
        Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.
        J. Gerontol. A Biol. 2001; 56: M146-M156
        • Salinas-Rodriguez A.
        • Manrique-Espinoza B.
        • Heredia-Pi I.
        • Rivera-Almaraz A.
        • Avila-Funes J.A.
        Healthcare costs of frailty: implications for long-term care.
        J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2019; 20: 102-103
        • WHO
        WHO clinical consortium on healthy ageing.
        in: Report of Consortium Meeting 1–2 December 2016 in Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, Geneva2017
        • WHO
        World Report on Health and Ageing 2015.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2015
        • Turner G.
        • Clegg A.
        Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a british geriatrics society, age UK and royal college of general practitioners report.
        Age Ageing. 2014; 43: 744-747
        • Aguayo G.A.
        • Donneau A.F.
        • Vaillant M.T.
        • Schritz A.
        • Franco O.H.
        • Stranges S.
        • Malisoux L.
        • Guillaume M.
        • Witte D.R.
        Agreement between 35 published frailty scores in the general population.
        Am. J. Epidemiol. 2017; 186: 420-434
      1. Specialised Clinical Frailty Network Clinical Frailty Scale, https://www.scfn.org.uk/clinical-frailty-scale, 2018 (Accessed 21 September 2020).

        • Moody D.
        • Lyndon H.
        • Stevens G.
        Toolkit for General Practice in Supporting Older People Living With Frailty.
        NHS England, Leeds2017
      2. Social Welfare Department District Elderly Community Centre, https://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_elderly/sub_csselderly/id_districtel/, 2020 (Accessed 23 September 2020).

      3. Social Welfare Department Neighbourhood Elderly Centre, https://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_elderly/sub_csselderly/id_neighbourhood/, 2020 (Accessed 23 September 2020).

      4. Social Welfare Department Social Centres for the Elderly, https://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_elderly/sub_csselderly/id_socialcent/, 2020 (Accessed 23 September 2020).

        • Morley J.E.
        • Malmstrom T.K.
        • Miller D.K.
        A Simple Frailty Questionnaire (FRAIL) Predicts Outcomes in Middle Aged African Americans.
        J. Nutr. Health Aging. 2012; 16: 601-608
        • Dong L.J.
        • Qiao X.X.
        • Tian X.Y.
        • Liu N.
        • Jin Y.R.
        • Si H.X.
        • Wang C.L.
        Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the FRAIL scale in chinese community-dwelling older adults.
        J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2018; 19: 12-17
        • Gonzalez E.D.L.
        • Hermosillo H.G.
        • Beltran J.A.M.
        • Chavez J.H.M.
        • Corona R.P.
        • Garza D.P.S.
        • Quintanilla K.A.R.
        Validation of the FRAIL scale in mexican elderly: results from the Mexican health and aging study.
        Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2016; 28: 901-908
        • Lopez D.
        • Flicker L.
        • Dobson A.
        Validation of the FRAIL scale in a cohort of older Australian women.
        J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2012; 60: 171-173
        • Rosas-Carrasco O.
        • Cruz-Arenas E.
        • Parra-Rodriguez L.
        • Garcia-Gonzalez A.I.
        • Contreras-Gonzalez L.H.
        • Szlejf C.
        Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the FRAIL scale to assess frailty in Mexican adults.
        J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2016; 17: 1094-1098
        • Susanto M.
        • Hubbard R.E.
        • Gardiner P.A.
        Validity and responsiveness of the FRAIL scale in middle-aged women.
        J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2018; 19: 65-69
        • Woo J.
        • Yu R.
        • Wong M.
        • Yeung F.
        • Wong M.
        • Lum C.
        Frailty screening in the community using the FRAIL scale.
        J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2015; 16: 412-419
        • Morley J.E.
        Frailty and sarcopenia: the new geriatric giants.
        Rev. Invest. Clin. 2016; 68: 59-67
        • Malmstrom T.K.
        • Morley J.E.
        SARC-F: a simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia.
        J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2013; 14: 531-532
        • Woo J.
        • Yu R.
        • Leung J.
        A 3-item SARC-F.
        J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2018; 19: 223-228
        • Lam L.C.
        • Lui V.W.
        • Tam C.W.
        • Chiu H.F.
        Subjective memory complaints in Chinese subjects with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease.
        Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2005; 20: 876-882
        • Lawton M.P.
        • Brody E.M.
        Assessment of older people - self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.
        Gerontologist. 1969; 9: 179-186
        • Tong A.Y.C.
        • Man D.W.K.
        The validation of the Hong Kong chinese version of the lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale for institutionalized elderly persons.
        OTJR-Occup. Part. Health. 2002; 22: 132-142
        • Yu R.
        • Tong C.
        • Woo J.
        Effect of an integrated care model for pre-frail and frail older people living in community.
        Age Ageing. 2020;