Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 128, P60-63, October 2019

Attitudes to the prescription of menopause hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms and osteoporosis for patients of different ages: A survey of gynecologists in Belgium

      Highlights

      • The interpretation of the literature on menopause hormone therapy (MHT) has evolved enormously over the last decade.
      • Severe vasomotor symptoms were recognized by most gynecologists as an indication for menopause hormone therapy when a woman is in her 50 s.
      • This was much less so for a woman over 60 years of age.
      • Osteoporosis was much less often recognized as an indication for menopause hormone therapy, even for women in their 50 s.

      Abstract

      Introduction

      The interpretation of the literature on menopause hormone therapy (MHT) has evolved enormously over the last decade. In recent years, guidelines have reinstated the place of MHT.

      Aim

      This survey analyzes the prescription (initiation and maintenance) of MHT in relation to patient age and therapy indications.

      Material and method

      Two vignettes were sent to gynecologists working in Belgium in a random survey. One vignette concerned the initiation of therapy for a woman who was either 52 or 62 years old, suffering either from severe vasomotor symptoms (VSM) or from osteoporosis. The second vignette concerned the maintenance of MHT or switching to another medication in a woman aged 62 years who suffered either from VSM (when stopping MHT) or from osteoporosis. The physicians were asked how they would treat these two patients.

      Results

      We analyzed 443 vignettes from 222 physicians.

      Initiation of MHT

      84% of the respondents would initiate MHT for a 52-year-old woman with VMS, whereas only 32% would do so for a 52-year-old woman who had osteoporosis (chi square = 33; p < 0.001). 51% would initiate MHT for a 62-year-old woman with VMS, whereas only 14% would do so for a 62-year-old woman with osteoporosis (chi square = 17; p < 0.001).

      Maintenance of therapy

      87% would maintain MHT for a 62-year-old woman with severe VMS and 52% would do so for a 62-year-old woman with osteoporosis (Chi Square 31; p < 0.001).

      Conclusion

      VMS are recognized as an indication for MHT, but osteoporosis much less so, even for women around the age of 50.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Maturitas
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ameye L.
        • Antoine C.
        • Paesmans M.
        • de Azambuja E.
        • Rozenberg S.
        Menopausal hormone therapy use in 17 European countries during the last decade.
        Maturitas. 2014; 79 (Epub 2014 Aug 4. Erratum in: Maturitas. 2015 May;81(1):237-8): 287-291https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.002
        • Manson J.E.
        • Kaunitz A.M.
        Menopause management—Getting clinical care back on track.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2016; 374: 803-806https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1514242
        • Kling J.M.
        • MacLaughlin K.L.
        • Schnatz P.F.
        • Crandall C.J.
        • Skinner L.J.
        • Stuenkel C.A.
        • Kaunitz A.M.
        • Bitner D.L.
        • Mara K.
        • Fohmader Hilsaca K.S.
        • Faubion S.S.
        Menopause management knowledge in postgraduate family medicine, internal medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology residents: a cross-sectional survey.
        Mayo Clin. Proc. 2019; 94: 242
      1. R.D. Langer, J.A. Simon, A. Pines, R.A. Lobo, H.N. Hodis, J.H. Pickar, H.N. Hodis, J.H. Pickar, D.F. Archer, P.M. Sarrel & W.H. Utian Menopausal hormone therapy for primary prevention: why the USPSTF is wrong Climacteric in Press Pages 1-12 | Received 04 Jul 2017, Accepted 28 Jul 2017, Published online: 14 Aug 2017.

        • Stuenkel C.A.
        • Davis S.R.
        • Gompel A.
        • Lumsden M.A.
        • Murad M.H.
        • Pinkerton J.V.
        • Santen R.J.
        Treatment of symptoms of the menopause: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.
        J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015; 100 (Epub 2015 Oct 7): 3975-4011https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-2236
      2. The NAMS 2017 hormone therapy position statement advisory panel. The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society.
        Menopause. 2017; 24: 728
        • Baber R.J.
        • Panay N.
        • A. Fenton the IMS Writing Group
        2016 IMS Recommendations on women’s midlife health and menopause hormone therapy.
        Climacteric. 2016; 19: 109-150https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2015.1129166
        • Rozenberg S.
        • Murillo D.
        • Gevers R.
        • Vandromme J.
        Propensity of gynaecologists towards osteoporosis management and treatment.
        Maturitas. 2006; 53 (Epub 2005 Sep 22): 483-488
        • Rozenberg S.
        • Vandromme J.
        • Antoine C.
        Postmenopausal hormone therapy: risks and benefits.
        Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013; 9 (Epub 2013 Feb 19): 216-227https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2013.17
        • Maki P.M.
        • Drogos L.L.
        • Rubin L.H.
        • Banuvar S.
        • Shulman L.P.
        • Geller S.E.
        Objective hot flashes are negatively related to verbal memory performance in midlife women.
        Menopause. 2008; 15: 848-856https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0b013e31816d815e
        • Sarrel P.
        • Portman D.
        • Lefebvre P.
        • Lafeuille M.H.
        • Grittner A.M.
        • Fortier J.
        • Gravel J.
        • Duh M.S.
        • Aupperle P.M.
        Incremental direct and indirect costs of untreated vasomotor symptoms.
        Menopause. 2015; 22: 260-266https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000320
        • Maclennan A.H.
        • Broadbent J.L.
        • Lester S.
        • Moore V.
        Oral oestrogen and combined oestrogen/progestogen therapy versus placebo for hot flushes.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019; 4 (CD002978)https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002978.pub2
      3. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 141: management of menopausal symptoms.
        Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 123: 202
        • Chung H.F.
        • Pandeya N.
        • Dobson A.J.
        • Kuh D.
        • Brunner E.J.
        • Crawford S.L.
        • Avis N.E.
        • Gold E.B.
        • Mitchell E.S.
        • Woods N.F.
        • Bromberger J.T.
        • Thurston R.C.
        • Joffe H.
        • Yoshizawa T.
        • Anderson D.
        • Mishra G.D.
        The role of sleep difficulties in the vasomotor menopausal symptoms and depressed mood relationships: an international pooled analysis of eight studies in the Inter LACE consortium.
        Psychol. Med. 2018; 48 (Epub 2018 Feb 12): 2550-2561https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718000168
        • Gartoulla P.
        • Worsley R.
        • Bell R.J.
        • Davis S.R.
        Moderate to severe vasomotor and sexual symptoms remain problematic for women aged 60 to 65 years.
        Menopause. 2018; 25: 1331-1338https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001237
        • Avis N.E.
        • Crawford S.L.
        • Greendale G.
        • Bromberger J.T.
        • Everson-Rose S.A.
        • Gold E.B.
        • Hess R.
        • Joffe H.
        • Kravitz H.M.
        • Tepper P.G.
        • Thurston R.C.
        Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Duration of menopausal vasomotor symptoms over the menopause transition.
        JAMA Intern. Med. 2015; 175: 531
      4. National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG): Clinical guideline for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (2017, updated 2018).