Advertisement

The social value of the arts for care home residents in England: A Social Return on Investment (SROI) analysis of the Imagine Arts programme

      Highlights

      • Arts activities lead to positive outcomes for people with dementia.
      • We used social return on investment (SROI) analysis to assess the social and economic benefits of an arts intervention.
      • We found that people with dementia experienced improved cognition and physical health.
      • Care home staff had increased confidence in using arts interventions.

      Abstract

      Background

      Direct involvement in creative activities can have benefits in terms of improved attention and positive engagement for older people. We used the social return on investment (SROI) approach to explore the social and economic benefits of arts activities for older people living in residential homes in England.

      Methods

      We complied with the CHEERS checklist and followed the six stages of SROI as reported in the literature.

      Results

      We identified three main stakeholders: care home residents, care home personnel, and activity co-ordinators. For residents, the outcomes of interest were: community inclusion, mental and physical health, improved cognition and decreased social isolation. For care home personnel and activity co-ordinators the outcomes were: improved skills in caring for older people and increased confidence in using arts interventions. The analysis yielded an SROI of £1.20 for every £1 of expenditure. The sensitivity analysis revealed that when we consider a displacement rate of 15% for all the outcomes of all participating stakeholders, the Imagine study is unlikely to report a ratio that is less than £1.02 for every £1.00 invested.

      Conclusions

      Findings could inform policy decisions about investment in the arts and health or social care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Maturitas
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Taylor J.
        • Bradbury-Jones J.C.
        International principles of social impact assessment: lessons for research?.
        J. Res. Nurs. 2011; 16: 133-145
        • Banke-Thomas A.O.
        • Madaj B.
        • Charles A.
        • van den Broek N.
        Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review.
        BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 582
        • Cook M.
        The Public Services (Social Value) Act.
        2012 (Accessed 30 June 2016)
      1. Care Quality Commission (CQC), Care Quality Commission to Provide Residential and Nursing Care.
        2015 (Accessed 30 June 2016)
        • Broome E.
        • Dening T.
        • Schneider J.
        Facilitating imagine arts in residential care homes: the artists’ perspectives.
        Arts Health. 2017; : 1-13
        • Wenborn J.
        • Challis D.
        • Head J.
        • Miranda‐Castillo C.
        • Popham C.
        • Thakur R.
        • et al.
        Providing activity for people with dementia in care homes: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
        Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2013; 28: 1296-1304
        • Fisher B.J.
        • Specht D.K.
        Successful aging and creativity in later life.
        J. Aging Stud. 1999; 13: 457-472
        • Woollacott M.
        • Shumway-Cook A.
        Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research.
        Gait Posture. 2002; 16: 1-14
        • Young R.
        • Camic P.M.
        • Tischler V.
        The impact of community-based arts and health interventions on cognition in people with dementia: a systematic literature review.
        Aging Ment. Health. 2016; 20: 337-351
        • Camic P.M.
        • Williams C.M.
        • Meeten F.
        Does a ‘Singing together Group’ improve the quality of life of people with a dementia and their carers? A pilot evaluation study.
        Dementia. 2013; 12: 157-176
        • MacPherson S.
        • Bird M.
        • Anderson K.
        • Davis T.
        • Blair A.
        An art gallery access programme for people with dementia: ‘You do it for the moment’.
        Aging Ment. Health. 2009; 13: 744-752
        • Skingley A.
        • De’Ath S.
        • Napleton L.
        Evaluation of edna: arts and dance for older people.
        Work. With Older People. 2016; 20: 46-56
        • Coulton S.
        • Clift S.
        • Skingley A.
        • Rodriguez J.
        Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community singing on mental health-related quality of life of older people: randomised controlled trial.
        Br. J. Psychiatry. 2015; 207: 250-255
        • Phillips L.J.
        • Reid-Arndt S.A.
        • Pak Y.
        Effects of a creative expression intervention on emotions, communication, and quality of life in persons with dementia.
        Nurs. Res. 2010; 59: 417
        • Cohen G.D.
        The Creativity and Aging Study: the Impact of Professionally Conducted Cultural Programmes on Older Adults.
        2006
        • Archer L.
        • Davidson S.
        • Iparraguirre J.
        • Kohler M.
        • Pursch B.
        • Vass J.
        • Curran F.
        Creative and Cultural Activities and Wellbeing in Later Life, Age UK.
        (London)2018
        • Broome E.
        • Dening T.
        • Schneider J.
        • Brooker D.
        Care staff and the creative arts: exploring the context of involving care personnel in arts interventions.
        Int. Psychogeriatr. 2017; 29: 1979-1991https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610217001478
      2. Department for Business Innovation and Skills, Learning for Older People in Care Settings: a Guide for Activity Coordinators and Care Staff.
        2014 (Accessed 13 April 2016)
        • Social Value Lab, Craft Cafe
        Creative Solutions to Isolation and Loneliness, Social Return on Investment Evaluation, Report for Impact Arts.
        Social Value Lab, Glasgow2011
        • Emerson J.
        • Cabaj M.
        Social return on investment.
        Making Waves. 2000; 11: 10-14
      3. The SROI Network.
        2011 (Accessed 06 April 2016)
        • Millar R.
        • Rall K.
        Social Return on Investment (SROI) and performance measurement: the opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care.
        Public Manag. Rev. 2013; 15: 923-941
        • Arvidson M.
        • Lyon F.
        • McKay S.
        • Moro D.
        Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI).
        Volunt. Sect. Rev. 2013; 4: 3-18
        • Krlev G.
        • Bund E.
        • Mildenberger G.
        Measuring what matters—indicators of social innovativeness on the national level.
        Inf. Syst. Manag. 2014; 31: 200-224
        • Mook L.
        • Maiorano J.
        • Ryan S.
        • Armstrong A.
        • Quarter J.
        Turning social return on investment on its head: the stakeholder impact statement.
        Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 2015; 26: 229-246
        • Whelan G.
        Understanding the social value and well-being benefits created by museums: a case for social return on investment methodology.
        Arts Health. 2015; 7: 216-230
        • Banke-Thomas A.O.
        • Madaj B.
        • Charles A.
        • van den Broek
        Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review.
        BMC Public Health. 2014; 15: 582https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1935-7
        • BrandonCare
        Social Return on Investment Pilot Report.
        2011 (Accessed 2 May 2016)
        • All-Party Parliamentary Group on Arts Health and Wellbeing
        Creative Health: The Arts for Health and Wellbeing.
        second ed. 2017 (Inquiry Report)
      4. Office of National Statistics: Census.
        2011 (Accessed 30 June 2016)
        • Husereau D.
        • Drummond M.
        • Petrou S.
        • Carswell C.
        • Moher D.
        • Greenberg D.
        • Augustovski F.
        • Briggs A.H.
        • Mauskopf J.
        • Loder E.
        Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement.
        Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 2013; 11: 6
        • Nicholls J.E.
        • Lawlor E.
        • Neitzert T.
        Goodspeed, A Guide to Social Return on Investment.
        (Available at:) SROI Network, Liverpool, UK2012
        • The Museum of Modern Art
        The MoMA Alzheimer’s Project: Making Art Accessible to People With Dementia.
        2009
        • Bolger N.
        • Davis A.
        • Rafaeli E.
        Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived.
        Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2003; 54: 579-616
        • Travers C.
        Unveiling a reflective diary methodology for exploring the lived experiences of stress and coping.
        J. Vocat. Behav. 2011; 79: 204-216
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        Using thematic analysis in psychology.
        Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006; 3: 77-101
        • Broome E.
        • Dening T.
        • Schneider J.
        Facilitating imagine Arts in residential care homes: the artists’ perspectives.
        Arts Health. 2017; : 1-13
        • Broome E.
        • Jones B.
        • Dening T.
        • Schneider J.
        • Tischler V.
        Bringing arts interventions into care settings.
        J. Dementia Care. 2017; 25: 24-26
      5. HACT Social Value Bank. http://www.hact.org.uk/social-value-bank. (Accessed 25 June 2016).

        • Treasury H.M.
        The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, London.
        2011 (Accessed 01 July 2016)
        • OECD Publishing
        OECD Digital Economy Outlook.
        OECD Publishing, 2017
      6. Vineburgh Regeneration Initiative SROI Study.
        2011 (Accessed 8 July 2016)
        • Curtis L.
        • Burns A.
        Unit Costs of Health and Social Care.
        2015 (Accessed 8 July 2016)
      7. Nuffield-Health.
        2016 (Accessed 28 June 2016)
        • Comas-Herrera A.
        • Knapp M.
        Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST): Summary of Evidence on Cost-effectiveness.
        2016
      8. The Cunninghame Housing Association SROI.
        2014 (Accessed 15 April 2016)
      9. Inspirativearts. http://www.inspirativearts.co.uk/. (Accessed 25 June 2016).

      10. Alzheimer’s Society. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/documents_info.php?documentID=2883. (Accessed 30 June 2016).

        • Keogh J.W.
        • Kilding A.
        • Pidgeon P.
        • Ashley L.
        • Gillis D.
        Physical benefits of dancing for healthy older adults: a review.
        J. Aging Phys. Act. 2009; 17: 479-500
        • O’Shea E.A.M.O.N.
        • Léime A.N.
        The impact of the Bealtaine arts programme on the quality of life, wellbeing and social interaction of older people in Ireland.
        Ageing Soc. 2012; 32: 851-872