Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 101, P12-16, July 2017

A quantitative comparison of anti-Müllerian hormone measurement and its shifting boundaries between two assays

  • A.C. de Kat
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
    Affiliations
    Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • F.J.M. Broekmans
    Affiliations
    Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • A.C. van Westing
    Affiliations
    Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • E. Lentjes
    Affiliations
    Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • W.M.M. Verschuren
    Affiliations
    Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

    National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • Y.T. van der Schouw
    Affiliations
    Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • Although many AMH assays with differing characteristics are currently available, there are relatively few comparisons between them.
      • AMH measurements performed by the picoAMH and Gen II assays were highly correlated in 1985 premenopausal women.
      • The picoAMH detected AMH in 78% of the samples in which it was deemed undetectable with the Gen II assay.
      • Future research could help determine the value of measuring very low levels of AMH.

      Abstract

      Objective

      Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a quantitative marker of ovarian reserve, is used for both clinical and research purposes in the field of reproductive medicine. Numerous AMH assays have been developed. Among other factors, the lack of large-scale comparisons of the various assays hinders the universal interpretation of AMH levels. Moreover, little is known of the practical performance of highly sensitive assays compared with conventional assays with regard to the very low AMH levels found in women nearing menopause. This study aimed to compare the measurements of the Gen II (Beckman Coulter) assay with those of the highly sensitive picoAMH (AnshLabs) assay.

      Methods

      This cross-sectional study included 1985 premenopausal women who completed the second visit of the population-based Doetinchem Cohort Study, with a mean age of 42 ± 7 years. AMH levels were measured with the Gen II and picoAMH assays. Passing-Bablok and Bland Altman analyses were performed and differences in the proportion of detectable samples were assessed.

      Results

      The results from the Gen II and picoAMH assays were highly correlated, with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.91. The Passing-Bablok regression formula was picoAMH = 0.01 + 1.69 * GenII, meaning that on average picoAMH levels were 69% higher than Gen II levels. Of the 670 samples with an undetectable AMH value with the Gen II assay, AMH could be detected in 78% with the picoAMH assay, at a median concentration [interquartile range] of 0.05 [0.01–0.14] ng/mL.

      Conclusion

      These results indicate that, despite a high correlation, there is a large relative difference between results of the Gen II and picoAMH assays. The use of a highly sensitive AMH assay is likely to result in a large increase in the proportion of samples with detectable levels. This may enable research into women’s health across the menopausal transition and research into the potential clinical benefits of distinguishing between women with very low ovarian reserve.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Maturitas
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hansen K.R.
        • Hodnett G.M.
        • Knowlton N.
        • Craig L.B.
        Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number.
        Fertil. Steril. 2011; 1: 170-175
        • Broekmans F.J.
        • Soules M.R.
        • Fauser B.C.
        Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences.
        Endocr. Rev. 2009; 5: 465-493
        • Kumar A.
        • Kalra B.
        • Patel A.
        • McDavid L.
        • Roudebush W.E.
        Development of a second generation anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) ELISA.
        J. Immunol. Methods. 2010; 1–2: 51-59
        • Wallace A.M.
        • Faye S.A.
        • Fleming R.
        • Nelson S.M.
        A multicentre evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter anti-Mullerian hormone immunoassay (AMH Gen II).
        Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2011; : 370-373
        • Li H.W.
        • Ng E.H.
        • Wong B.P.
        • Anderson R.A.
        • Ho P.C.
        • Yeung W.S.
        Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) determination.
        J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2012; 12: 1443-1446
        • Robertson D.M.
        • Kumar A.
        • Kalra B.
        • et al.
        Detection of serum antimullerian hormone in women approaching menopause using sensitive antimullerian hormone enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
        Menopause. 2014; 12: 1277-1286
        • Su H.I.
        • Sammel M.D.
        • Homer M.V.
        • Bui K.
        • Haunschild C.
        • Stanczyk F.Z.
        Comparability of antimullerian hormone levels among commercially available immunoassays.
        Fertil. Steril. 2014; 6 (72. e1)
        • Welsh P.
        • Smith K.
        • Nelson S.M.
        A single-centre evaluation of two new anti-Mullerian hormone assays and comparison with the current clinical standard assay.
        Hum. Reprod. 2014; 5: 1035-1041
        • Gruson D.
        • Homsak E.
        Measurement of anti-Mullerian hormone: performances of a new ultrasensitive immunoassay.
        Clin. Biochem. 2015; 6: 453-455
        • van Helden J.
        • Weiskirchen R.
        Performance of the two new fully automated anti-Mullerian hormone immunoassays compared with the clinical standard assay.
        Hum. Reprod. 2015; 8: 1918-1926
        • Nelson S.M.
        • Pastuszek E.
        • Kloss G.
        • et al.
        Two new automated, compared with two enzyme-linked immunosorbent, antimullerian hormone assays.
        Fertil. Steril. 2015; 4 (1021. e6)
        • Pearson K.
        • Long M.
        • Prasad J.
        • Wu Y.Y.
        • Bonifacio M.
        Assessment of the access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH generation II manual ELISA.
        Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2016; 8 (016-0143-3)
        • Iliodromiti S.
        • Anderson R.A.
        • Nelson S.M.
        Technical and performance characteristics of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count as biomarkers of ovarian response.
        Hum. Reprod. Update. 2015; 6: 698-710
        • Li H.W.
        • Wong B.P.
        • Ip W.K.
        • Yeung W.S.
        • Ho P.C.
        • Ng E.H.
        Comparative evaluation of three new commercial immunoassays for anti-Mullerian hormone measurement.
        Hum. Reprod. 2016; 31: 2796-2802
        • Chai J.
        • Howie A.F.
        • Cameron D.A.
        • Anderson R.A.
        A highly-sensitive anti-Mullerian hormone assay improves analysis of ovarian function following chemotherapy for early breast cancer.
        Eur. J. Cancer. 2014; 14: 2367-2374
        • Iwase A.
        • Osuka S.
        • Nakamura T.
        • et al.
        Usefulness of the ultrasensitive Anti-Mullerian hormone assay for predicting true ovarian reserve.
        Reprod. Sci. 2016; 6: 756-760
        • Verschuren W.M.
        • Blokstra A.
        • Picavet H.S.
        • Smit H.A.
        Cohort profile: the Doetinchem cohort study.
        Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008; 6: 1236-1241
        • Dolleman M.
        • Verschuren W.M.
        • Eijkemans M.J.
        • et al.
        Reproductive and lifestyle determinants of anti-Mullerian hormone in a large population-based study.
        J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013; 5: 2106-2115
        • Craciunas L.
        • Roberts S.A.
        • Yates A.P.
        • Smith A.
        • Fitzgerald C.
        • Pemberton P.W.
        Modification of the Beckman-Coulter second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocol improves the reliability of serum antimullerian hormone measurement.
        Fertil. Steril. 2015; 2 (59. e1)
        • Bilic-Zulle L.
        Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
        Biochem. Med. (Zagreb). 2011; 1: 49-52
        • Robertson D.M.
        • Hale G.E.
        • Fraser I.S.
        • Hughes C.L.
        • Burger H.G.
        Changes in serum antimullerian hormone levels across the ovulatory menstrual cycle in late reproductive age.
        Menopause. 2011; 5: 521-524
        • de Kat A.C.
        • Verschuren W.M.
        • Eijkemans M.J.
        • van der Schouw Y.T.
        • Broekmans F.J.
        The association of low ovarian reserve with cardiovascular disease risk: a cross-sectional population-based study.
        Hum. Reprod. 2016; 8: 1866-1874
        • Mamsen L.S.
        • Petersen T.S.
        • Jeppesen J.V.
        • et al.
        Proteolytic processing of anti-Mullerian hormone differs between human fetal testes and adult ovaries.
        Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2015; 7: 571-582
        • Rustamov O.
        • Smith A.
        • Roberts S.A.
        • et al.
        Anti-Mullerian hormone: poor assay reproducibility in a large cohort of subjects suggests sample instability.
        Hum. Reprod. 2012; 10: 3085-3091
        • Han X.
        • McShane M.
        • Sahertian R.
        • White C.
        • Ledger W.
        Pre-mixing serum samples with assay buffer is a prerequisite for reproducible anti-Mullerian hormone measurement using the Beckman Coulter Gen II assay.
        Hum. Reprod. 2014; 5: 1042-1048
        • Nelson S.M.
        • Iliodromiti S.
        • Fleming R.
        • Anderson R.
        • McConnachie A.
        • Messow C.M.
        Reference range for the antimullerian hormone generation II assay: a population study of 10,984 women, with comparison to the established Diagnostics Systems Laboratory nomogram.
        Fertil. Steril. 2014; 2: 523-529