Abstract
Objectives
Generalized bone loss may contribute to the development of tooth loss in elderly individuals.
The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship of tooth count with hip and
spine densitometry and phalangeal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and to
compare skeletal status between women completely and partially edentulous and between
women with caries or periodontal disease.
Methods
In the study, 67 postmenopausal women (37 edentulous and 30 with partial tooth loss)
in the mean age of 62.8 ± 7.2 years were evaluated. No reasons with potential influence on bone metabolism (chronic
diseases or medications) were noted. In order to reveal the role of the factor underlying
tooth loss, all patients were also divided into subjects with caries (n = 27) and periodontal disease (n = 40). Skeletal status was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the
hip and spine (bone mineral density—BMD [g/cm2]) and by QUS at the hand proximal phalanges (amplitude-dependent speed of sound—Ad-SoS
[m/s]).
Results
Women completely and partially edentulous did not differ significantly but a tendency
to have lower values in women completely edentulous was noted. Comparisons between
women with caries and periodontitis also did not show any significant differences
(except for significantly lower Z-score of Ad-SoS in women with caries). Tooth count correlated only with hip BMD:
in the whole group (r = 0.25–0.30, p = 0.04–0.01) and in women with caries (r = 0.45–0.51, p = 0.02–0.006). In women with periodontitis tooth count correlated only with Ad-SoS (r = 0.36, p = 0.002).
Conclusion
Associations between dental and skeletal status indicate that systemic bone loss in
skeletal sites being mostly cortical may contribute to the tooth loss.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to MaturitasAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Reasons for extraction of remainent teeth in Japan.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994; 22: 303-306
- Postmenopausal tooth loss. Contributions to edentulism by osteoporosis and cigarette smoking.Arch Intern Med. 1983; 143: 1678-1682
- Diffuse alveolar atrophy of the jaw (non-inflammatory form of paradental disease) and pre-senilis osteoporosis.Geront Clin. 1960; 2: 68-86
- The relation between tooth loss and bone mass in postmenopausal osteoporotic women in Turkey: a multicenter study.J Bone Miner Metab. 2003; 21: 43-47
- Low metacarpal bone density, tooth loss, and periodontal disease in Japanese women.J Dent Res. 2001; 80: 1818-1822
- Tooth loss and skeletal density in healthy postmenopausal women.Osteoporos Int. 1994; 4: 104-109
- Increased risk of tooth loss is related to bone loss at the whole body, hip and spine.Calcif Tissue Int. 1996; 59: 433-437
- Relationship between bone mineral density and tooth loss in elderly Japanese women.Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 1999; 28: 219-223
- Self-reported number of remaining teeth is associated with bone mineral density of the femoral neck, but not of the spine, in Japanese men and women.Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15: 256-267
- Tooth loss and hip fractures in the elderly.J Bone Joint Surg. 1990; 72: 324-325
- Tooth counts do not predict bone mineral density in early postmenopausal Caucasian women. EPIC study group.Int J Epidemiol. 1998; 27: 479-483
- The relation between periodontitis and systemic bone mass in women between 46 an 55 years of age.J Clin Periodontol. 1992; 19: 492-496
- Mineral status of skeleton and advanced periodontal disease.J Clin Periodontol. 1994; 21: 184-188
- Self-reported tooth loss and bone mineral density in older men and women.Age Ageing. 1995; 24: 217-221
Article info
Publication history
Published online: July 07, 2006
Accepted:
October 25,
2005
Received in revised form:
October 14,
2005
Received:
March 14,
2005
Identification
Copyright
© 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.