Maturitas
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 277-284, July 2010

The breast cancer “plunge” after initial publication of the WHI results: An alternative explanation

  • James A. Simon

      Affiliations

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
    • Women's Health & Research Consultants®, Washington, DC, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Women's Health and Research Consultants®, Washington, DC, United States. Tel.: +1 202 293 1000.
  • ,
  • Gerard G. Nahum

      Affiliations

    • Global Clinical Development, U.S. Women's Healthcare, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Montville, NJ, United States
  • ,
  • Harold Stanislaw

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA, United States
  • ,
  • Tatiana Gaines

      Affiliations

    • Women's Health & Research Consultants®, Washington, DC, United States

Received 22 January 2010; received in revised form 1 March 2010; accepted 9 March 2010. published online 04 May 2010.

Abstract 

From 2002 to 2003, the breast cancer incidence in the United States, as reported by the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER 9) database, appeared to decrease by 6.7%. This phenomenon has been attributed to a reduction in the use of menopausal hormone therapies after the initial publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study results in July of 2002. However, attempts to draw a causal association between the use of menopausal hormone therapies and the incidence of breast cancer have not accounted for the facts that prescriptions of estrogen-plus-progestin menopausal therapies, which are associated with increased rates of breast cancer, fell by 53% from 2002 to 2003, while prescriptions of estrogen-only therapies fell by only 27%. To address this issue, we analyzed the effects of the higher rate of discontinuation of estrogen-plus-progestin menopausal therapies relative to estrogen-only treatments during the 2002–2003 time period, based upon the effects of different types of menopausal hormone therapies on breast cancer incidence as determined by the WHI interventional hormone trials. This approach demonstrates that the relative persistence with menopausal estrogen-only therapies – as compared to estrogen-plus-progestin therapies – can explain the reduction in breast cancer incidence from 2002 to 2003. In addition, we point out the incompatibility of the breast cancer incidence rates found in the two WHI interventional hormone trials and the rates reported in the SEER 9 database. Based on these findings, we conclude – as previously demonstrated in the estrogen-only arm of the WHI interventional hormone trials – that menopausal estrogen-only use is not responsible for increasing the risk of breast cancer in menopausal women and may, in fact, be protective. Additional studies are still needed to better define the relationship between different types of menopausal hormone therapies and the incidence of breast cancer.

Keywords: Breast cancer, Hormone therapy, Estrogen–progestin therapy, Estrogen-only therapy, HRT, HT, ERT, ET, WHI study, SEER 9 database

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0378-5122(10)00120-9

doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.03.011

Maturitas
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 277-284, July 2010