Maturitas
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 223-230, July 2010

Preventing and treating the accelerated ageing of obesity

  • John G. Kral

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
    • Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Surgery, Box 40, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA. Tel.: +1 718 270 1955; fax: +1 718 270 1317.
  • ,
  • Philip Otterbeck

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
    • Division of Endocrinology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Mariana Garcia Touza

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
    • Division of Endocrinology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA

Received 12 February 2010; received in revised form 19 February 2010; accepted 19 February 2010. published online 08 March 2010.

Abstract 

Advances in the molecular biology of ageing, insulin resistance, inflammation, carcinogenesis and caloric restriction have elucidated commonalities relevant to the chronic overnutrition syndrome termed obesity. Not until the expanded acceptance and availability of surgical treatment of obesity (“bariatric surgery”) has it been possible to explore the beneficial effects of sustained voluntary weight loss through controlled undernutrition in freely living people. Bariatric surgery is 58 years old and has undergone dramatic improvements recently becoming significantly safer and more accessible owing to the development of minimally invasive approaches and other advances. Furthermore, it is cost-effective compared to all forms of non-operative treatment. Thus older candidates, with more numerous and severe comorbidities are being recruited, increasing the pool of patients who have had operations which extend the otherwise shorter lives of the obese. Here we describe two mechanistically different operations, gastric restrictive and diversionary, and address their risks, complications, side-effects and beneficial outcomes, in aggregate increasing longevity, reducing morbidity and most important: improving health-related quality-adjusted life years.

Keywords: Calorie restriction, Cancer, Eating behavior, Inflammation, Osteoarthritis, Transplantation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0378-5122(10)00078-2

doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.02.011

Maturitas
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 223-230, July 2010