Maturitas
Volume 62, Issue 2 , Pages 140-145, 20 February 2009

Do different delivery systems of hormone therapy have different effects on psychological symptoms in surgically menopausal women? A randomized controlled trial

  • Basak Baksu

      Affiliations

    • Şişli Etfal Training and Research Hospital 3, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, İstanbul, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Nato Yolu Doktorlar Sitesi A9 D:9, Çengelköy/İstanbul, Turkey Tel.: +90 216 329 61 06; fax: +90 212 259 10 50.
  • ,
  • Alparslan Baksu

      Affiliations

    • Şişli Etfal Training and Research Hospital 1 and 3, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, İstanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Nimet Göker

      Affiliations

    • Şişli Etfal Training and Research Hospital 1 and 3, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, İstanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • S. Citak

      Affiliations

    • Bakirkoy State Hospital of Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases 2, Psychiatry Clinic, İstanbul, Turkey

Received 9 April 2008; received in revised form 15 December 2008; accepted 15 December 2008. published online 19 January 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

To compare the influence of different delivery forms of estrogen therapy on menopausal and psychological symptoms in surgically menopausal women.

Study design

Surgically menopausal women were assigned to a 1-year-therapy with oral conjugated estrogen 0.625mg/day (n=35), intranasal 300μg/day estradiol hemihidrate (n=33), percutaneous gel 1.5mg/day estradiol hemihidrate (n=32) or no treatment (control group, n=32). Serum E2 and FSH levels, Kupperman's Scale used to assess climacteric symptoms, Hamilton Depression Scale (HDRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) scores were assessed before and after 1-year-therapy.

Results

After 1 year, the greatest increase in E2 was in the oral group, followed by the transdermal gel, and then the intranasal group (oral vs transdermal gel: p=0.022: oral vs intranasal: p=0.0001; transdermal gel vs intranasal: p=0.0001). All treatment groups improved significantly in total Kupperman index score and HARS (p<0.05) with no difference between the groups. With regard to HDRS, all treatment groups improved significantly (p<0.05) with the greatest improvement in the oral group, and no difference between transdermal gel and intranasal groups (oral vs transdermal gel: p=0.015; oral vs intranasal: p=0.001; transdermal gel vs intranasal: p=0.735). Control group scored worse in all tests after study (p<0.05). All scores correlated significantly with post-treatment serum E2 and FSH levels (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Oral, intranasal and percutaneous gel estradiol therapies significantly improve menopausal and psychological symptoms in surgically menopausal women with oral route better than transdermal gel and intranasal modalities against depressive mood.

Keywords: Menopause, Hormonal therapy, Climacteric symptoms, Depression, Anxiety

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0378-5122(08)00394-0

doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.010

Maturitas
Volume 62, Issue 2 , Pages 140-145, 20 February 2009