Maturitas
Volume 61, Issue 4 , Pages 317-322, 20 December 2008

Timing of menarche, childbearing and hysterectomy risk

  • Rachel Cooper

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, 33 Bedford Place, London WC1B 5JU, UK. Tel.: +44 20 7670 5714; fax: +44 20 7580 1501.
  • ,
  • Rebecca Hardy
  • ,
  • Diana Kuh

MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, London, UK

Received 29 July 2008; received in revised form 23 September 2008; accepted 24 September 2008. published online 31 October 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

To examine the associations of age at menarche, timing of first birth and parity with hysterectomy rates; to investigate whether these associations were independent of each other and other potential confounders and varied by reason for hysterectomy.

Methods

Women from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development, a cohort followed prospectively since birth in March 1946 across England, Scotland and Wales, were studied. Survival analyses were used to assess the relationships between reproductive characteristics and hysterectomy.

Results

Age at menarche was inversely associated with hysterectomy rates (adjusted Hazard Ratio for hysterectomy associated with a 1 year increase in menarche=0.85 (95% CI: 0.77–0.95)). Parity was also associated with hysterectomy; women with ≥3 children experienced higher rates of hysterectomy than women with 1–2 children, who themselves experienced higher rates than nulliparous women. The associations of parity and age at menarche with hysterectomy were independent of each other and potential confounders. The association between age at menarche and hysterectomy was stronger for hysterectomies performed for fibroids than for other reasons.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that age at menarche is most likely acting to influence hysterectomy risk through its association with lifetime oestrogen exposure whereas parity is most likely acting through an effect on decision-making processes. This highlights the importance of considering both biological and social pathways to hysterectomy and confirms that medical need is not the only factor which needs to be considered when making treatment decisions for gynaecological problems.

Keywords: Age at menarche, Parity, Age at first birth, Hysterectomy, Birth cohorts

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0378-5122(08)00260-0

doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.09.025

Maturitas
Volume 61, Issue 4 , Pages 317-322, 20 December 2008