Maturitas
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 85-94, September 2008

HRT and Vit D in prevention of non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women; a 5 year randomized trial

  • Marja H. Komulainen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +358 17 173311; fax: +358 17 172749.
  • ,
  • Heikki Kroger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • Marjo T. Tuppurainen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • Anna-Mari Heikkinen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • Esko Alhava

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • Risto Honkanen

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway
    • Research Institute of Public Health, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • Seppo Saarikoski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

Abstract 

Objectives

We investigated the incidence of new non-vertebral fractures during HRT or low-dose vitamin (Vit) D3 supplementation in a 5-year prospective trial.

Methods

A total of 464 early postmenopausal women, (a subgroup of the Kuopio Osteoporosis Study, n=13100) were randomized to four groups: (1) HRT, a sequential combination of 2mg estradiol valerate and 1mg cyproterone acetate; (2) Vit D (300 IU/day and 100 IU/day during the fifth year); (3) HRT+Vit D; and (4) placebo. Lumbar (L2-4) and femoral neck bone mineral densities (BMD) were determined by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline, after 2.5 and 5 years of treatment. All new symptomatic non-vertebral, radiographically defined fractures were recorded.

Results

Altogether, 368 women (79%) completed the 5 year treatment. In all, 32 women had 39 non-vertebral fractures during a mean of 4.3 year follow-up (HRT 4, Vit D 10, HRT+Vit D 8 and placebo 17). The reduction in the incidence of new non-verterbral fractures was significant in women with HRT alone (P=0.032) when adjusted by baseline BMD and previous fractures; observed also with the intention-to-treat principle (P=0.048). When the HRT groups were pooled, HRT showed a significantly lower incidence of new non-vertebral fractures (P=0.042) than women receiving placebo and also after adjusting as above (P=0.016); both in valid-case and in the intention-to-treat analysis. In the Vit D group, the fracture incidence was non-significantly decreased (P=0.229) in comparison with the placebo group. The estimated risk of new non-vertebral fractures among women treated with HRT alone was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.10–0.90) and with Vit D 0.47 (95% CI, 0.20–1.14) and with HRT+Vit D 0.44 (95% CI, 0.17–1.15), in comparison with the placebo group (adjusted by femoral BMD and previous fractures).

Conclusions

This study is the first prospective trial confirming the beneficial effect of HRT on prevention of peripheral fractures in non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women. The effect of low-dose Vit D remains to be proved.

Keywords: Fracture risk, Hormone replacement therapy, Osteoporosis, Menopause, Vitamin D3

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint of an article originally published in Maturitas, 31(1), pp. 45–54.

PII: S0378-5122(08)00229-6

doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.09.012

Maturitas
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 85-94, September 2008