Maturitas
Volume 60, Issue 1 , Pages 59-64, 20 May 2008

Risks of hormone therapy in the 50–59 year age group

Gelre Teaching Hospital , Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, PO Box 9014, 7300DS Apeldoorn, The Netherlands

Received 24 November 2007; received in revised form 9 April 2008; accepted 14 April 2008. published online 21 May 2008.

Abstract 

Since 2002 patients and practitioners have undergone a significant change of thinking with regard to the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy. The publication of the results of the hormone intervention (CEE+MPA) trial in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Study in 2002 and of the data gathered in the observational Million Women Study (MWS) in 2003 focused on risks of hormone therapy (HT) and contributed to a significant decline in its use. For menopause management, benefits and risks associated with HT must be regarded critically. There are distinctions between the risks involved when HT is initiated within 10 years of menopause and/or in the 50–59 year age group and risks when HT is used later on in life. This helps clinicians to develop again a realistic perspective on prescription of HT for their symptomatic postmenopausal patients.

Keywords: Hormone therapy, Women's Health Initiative, Younger age group, Early postmenopausal women, Risks of hormone therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0378-5122(08)00117-5

doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.04.010

Maturitas
Volume 60, Issue 1 , Pages 59-64, 20 May 2008