Maturitas
Volume 57, Issue 1 , Pages 11-15, 20 May 2007

The problems with some epidemiological studies

Department of Epidemiology, University of Surrey, United Kingdom

published online 09 March 2007.

Abstract 

Epidemiological studies provide a valuable tool for the investigation of the causes of disease. However, such studies alone are rarely able to prove cause. No study is perfect and the evaluation of results must take account of the design and execution of the study together with the analytic methods used. Before imputing cause it is important to consider the findings against the criteria set out by Bradford Hill. Some of the problems with studies are discussed including the specification of the data collected, accuracy of information, end point definition, study size and the way results are presented. The issues are illustrated by reference to published papers. It is concluded that unless studies are evaluated and interpreted with care they may result in more harm than good.

Keywords: Investigation, Epidemiological, Accuracy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0378-5122(07)00063-1

doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.02.003

Maturitas
Volume 57, Issue 1 , Pages 11-15, 20 May 2007