Maturitas
Volume 55, Issue 4 , Pages 317-324, 20 November 2006

Influence of pattern of menopausal transition on the amount of trabecular bone loss:

Results from a 6-year prospective longitudinal study

  • V. Seifert-Klauss

      Affiliations

    • Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 89 4140 5434; fax: +49 89 4140 4912.
  • ,
  • T. Link

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of San Francisco, United States
  • ,
  • C. Heumann

      Affiliations

    • Institut für Statistik, Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität, München, Germany
  • ,
  • P. Luppa

      Affiliations

    • Institut für Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie, Technische Universität München, Germany
  • ,
  • M. Haseitl

      Affiliations

    • Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany
  • ,
  • J. Laakmann

      Affiliations

    • Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany
  • ,
  • J. Rattenhuber

      Affiliations

    • Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany
  • ,
  • M. Kiechle

      Affiliations

    • Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany

Received 11 November 2005; received in revised form 22 April 2006; accepted 26 April 2006.

Abstract 

Introduction

Bone density is lower in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women. Recent findings have suggested that accelerated bone loss already begins before menopause. Despite numerous cross-sectional studies on menopause-related bone density, longitudinal data on perimenopausal bone density changes are scarce. This study sought to characterize the dynamics of changes leading to postmenopausal osteopenia and to possibly find the time point at which accelarated bone loss begins.

Methods

We prospectively followed 34 pre-, peri- and early postmenopausal women without prior external hormone use, measuring their lumbar spine trabecular bone density with quantitative computer tomography at 0, 2 and 6 years. The analysis of the changes over time was done in a tri-parted fashion, since menopausal status changed variably for individual subjects: we grouped the participants according to their currently valid menopausal classification for prospective (baseline classification), interim (2 years) and retrospective (6-year classification) analysis.

Results

Six different patterns of menopausal transition were identified in our sample. Bone loss in the groups not reaching postmenopause during 6 years of observation was >50% of the maximum bone loss observed during the study period.

Invariably for all analyses, the perimenopausal phase with estrogen levels still adequate was associated with the greatest reduction of trabecular bone mineral density, reaching 6.3% loss annually in the lumbar spine. By comparison, the average rate of loss was slower in the early postmenopause; total bone loss differed by pattern of menopausal transition (one-way ANOVA p<0.05).

Conclusion

The presented data for the first time show the perimenopausal course of trabecular bone loss (as measured by QCT of the lumbar spine). Acceleration of bone loss during perimenopause reached half-maximal values of the total bone loss measured around menopause, despite adequate serum estradiol levels.

Keywords: Menopause, Bone density, Perimenopause, Estrogen, Bone loss

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0378-5122(06)00161-7

doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.04.024

Maturitas
Volume 55, Issue 4 , Pages 317-324, 20 November 2006